Monday, March 25, 2013

Idiocracy


            It is unfortunate that overcompensatory masculinity has become so pervasive that it’s set the standard for many people’s perceptions of masculinity.  Idiotic sports – and, more broadly, idiocy – are considered masculine.
            Men used to be perfectly acceptable for a man to be both good and intelligent; now, many males find these characteristics weak and effeminate. 
            Not only is the choice to watch or play football a stupid decision, football itself thrives on this very anti-intellectualism.  Witness the derision directed toward “eggheads” or computer formulas in Bowl Championship Series determinations.  Or, the disdain heaped on David Romer for suggesting – after carefully analyzing the evidence of thousands and thousands of plays – that teams ought to “go for it” on fourth down more frequently than they do.
            “If we all listened to the professor, we may all be looking for professor jobs,” professional coach Bill Cowher pontificated.
            If you get a chance, read the paper – entitled “Do Firms Maximize?  Evidence from Professional Football” – and draw your own conclusions.  The evidence is strong and fairly cut-and-dried: football coaches almost certainly adhere to conventional wisdom at the expense of their probability of winning the game. 
            Why didn’t a single team contact Romer, despite the significant media attention paid to his paper?  Why would they willingly ignore beneficial advice?
            Short answer: because they’re stupid.
            Slightly longer answer: because they’re anti-intellectual.  Intelligence (or, anything other than “football intelligence”, or the ability to make decisions in keeping with prevailing football mythology or sentiment) can actually impede your chances of rising to the top.
            Case in point: the “Wonderlic” test is a 50-question assessment administered to potential NFL draftees.  Sample questions include:

  • If pads of paper are 21 cents each, how much would four pads cost?
  • A train travels 20 feet in  of a second.  How far will it travel in three seconds?
  • Which of these represents the smallest amount?
    • 7
    • .8
    • 31
    • .33
    • 2

            Of the fifteen sample questions online at http://espn.go.com/page2/s/closer/020228test.html , I got fifteen correct in about five minutes.  This is not the world’s most difficult assessment. – I would expect second graders to get many of the questions correct.
Some teams pay close attention to all results.  All teams pay attention to some of the results: the ones at either extreme.  If players cannot score above ten out of fifty, most teams regard it as a red flag.  However, it is also a red flag if players score too high.  
            Apparently, even team executives know you’ve got to be stupid to play football.


No comments:

Post a Comment